Of significant importance in the practice of “regional” architecture is the use of building materials that are locally available. This simultaneously allows a work of architecture to reference nearby historical buildings, adds a fundamental element of sustainability by decreasing transportation, and contributes to the cultural identity of the project. Historically, the issue of building with local materials was irrelevant: architects built with what was available. Throughout the world, great monuments and local vernacular alike tended to reflect materials that were accessible, obtainable, and abundant. In contemporary practice, however, availability is limited not by distance or means but by the imagination: virtually any building material is available so long as the budget exists to procure and deliver it to the site. The desired aesthetic can be achieved with little or no reference to the specific place, disconnecting a building from the culture it serves, in direct opposition to the practice of regionalism. Conversely, when an architect designs by drawing upon locally available materials, the aesthetic of a building, which is largely due to its materiality, the result is a work of architecture that truly fits its site, both culturally and physically. A quintessential example of this architectural typology exists in contemporary practice in Switzerland.
The diverse natural landscape and often-extreme topography of Switzerland, in addition to a lack of ports, makes building with locally available materials not only relevant but requisite. The limitation of resources means that local building materials, which are inherently easier to obtain, must be fashioned so that they last longer and are used most effectively, which in turn means using them only for purposes to which they will serve better than any other material. Climate plays a large role in this as well, where a range of extreme weather conditions requires a performance in buildings that could not be achieved without careful consideration and assembly of materials.
Throughout Switzerland’s history, local building materials have been a precious resource, requiring thoughtful and careful assembly driven by climate, economy, and above all function. Today, research and innovation have provided novel applications for traditional materials, as seen in works by four contemporary Swiss architects: the duo of Valentin Bearth and Andrea Deplazes, Peter Zumthor, and Gion Caminada. These architects have positively contributed to regionalism in Switzerland’s architecture, carrying on a tradition for honesty in materiality, and making it a country of limited resources but exceptional design.
The Alpine terrain covering most of Switzerland makes it difficult to transport materials even over a small distance, yet somehow villages arose perched on the unlikeliest shelves of the mountains and tucked into valleys barely accessible due to the steep surrounding slopes. Three and four hundred years ago the farmers in these towns created a building typology that outlasted generations, as evidenced by the very same villages standing today, inhabited nearly as they were and often largely unchanged. This directly supports advice given by Adolph Loos’ for building in the mountains: “pay attention to the forms in which the locals build. For they are the fruits of wisdom gleaned from the past. But look for the origin of the form.” Function above all else is the origin of form and materiality in traditional Swiss buildings. Typically, houses were built out of a combination of stone and wood. The stone offers thermal properties in its mass, is resistant to fire, lasts indefinitely, and is relatively easy to come by nearly everywhere in Switzerland. Because of its thermal mass, stone is built up into walls often a meter and half thick that both support the house structurally and insulate it: keeping the interior cool in the summer and retaining heat in the winter. Wood plays an important role as well: whether constructed in the “strickbau” fashion of Valser buildings or used primarily in the barn as in the Graubünden region, the wood structures of the house rest directly on top of the stone base. This keeps the wood away from the damp ground, allowing it to stay dry in the winter and spring. The wood structures additionally offer more flow of air and light, and are much easier to transport and build with, hence the upper floors, interior walls, barns, and roofs were typically constructed entirely of rough wood. This lightness meant insulation was a problem, but the Swiss solved this in a very practical manner: the living spaces of the house were built on top of the barn and kitchen spaces, where the heat from the animals and from the hearth would rise to warm the rooms above.
As Loos advised, people continued the tradition of building that had developed with time, especially in their selection of materials, and thus this tradition of stone and wood houses has carried into contemporary architecture. Supplementing the wisdom of the past, contemporary Swiss architects have worked towards technological improvements on traditional building methods both in material elements and assembly, with much potential and success. The very limited palette of resources has perhaps inspired this need for research: to look towards the future, Swiss designers have looked into the past and questioned materiality, experimenting with various applications to add depth and variety and to improve architectural possibilities while referencing their history.
With such a rich building culture and natural landscape, architects in Switzerland have a responsibility to maintain tradition while pushing the practice into a contemporary style that reflects and builds upon the past, not accepting it without question, but not questioning its fundamental values. As Juhani Pallasmaa notes in his article Tradition and Modernity, “Culturally adapted architecture reverberates with tradition. It fuses and reflects the timeless vernacular idiom and, consequently, an authentic culture-specific architecture cannot be invented. It has to rediscover and revitalize aspects of tradition, either explicit characteristics of style or, more convincingly, the hidden dimensions of culture.” This evaluation, as well as the innovations in the research and application of building materials by Bearth and Deplazes, Peter Zumthor, and Gion Caminada demonstrate that successful architecture displays an innate sense of cultural sensitivity and historical receptivity: in essence the practice of regionalism.
Sources
Bearth & Deplazes. Konstruckte/Constructs. Quart Verlag: Luzern, Switzerland: 2005.
Buchanan, P. “Swiss Essentialists”, Architectural Review. Jan 1991. P 50.
Pallasmaa, J; “Tradition and Modernity”, Architectural Review. May 1988. P 27.
Opel, Adolf (ed.), Adolf Loos. Die potemkin’sche Stadt: verschollene Schriften 1987-1933, G.Prachnercop, Vienna, 1983. Translation: Jonathan Quinn.
2G, Revista internacional de Arquitectura. Building in the Mountains: Recent Architecture Graubunden. N. 14, 2000/II.
that is really informative and helpful.
ReplyDeletethanks a lot!